- HTML Translated Version -
Humanistic
Educational Theoretical Vision of the Generation Z 3.0 in Complex Times
Author: Carlos Liborio Camacho Quintero
Universidad de
Los Andes, ULA
ccamacho@ula.ve; clcamachoq71@gmail.com
Mérida, Venezuela
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to generate from a theoretical
humanistic vision cognitive strategies for building knowledge of the Z 3.0 generation,
where the teacher says that her students are a true digital natives and the
theory of mind to achieve cognizant results. From the methodological point of
view, the study is located within the qualitative paradigm in which the
dialectical hermeneutic method is used. Regarding key informants were four (4)
assigned to the Institute of Geography professors in technical interview was
used, and as the semi-structured interview instrument applied. Data were
processed using the categorization of information, while the reliability of
research is given by triangulation thereof, and with reference to the analysis
technique, was made by reviewing the material collected and coding thereof for
its respective interpretation. The research is based on a theoretical construct
based on systems theory, which attempts to unveil technological processes and
flexible learning environments in virtual classrooms in the digital age. The
author concludes that informants highlight the need to be trained in their
pedagogical practice. to transform the curricular competences based on
e-learning and b-learning that respond to these challenges of globalization.
Keywords: knowledge; humanism; teacher; learning.
Date Received: 06-02-2018 |
Date Acceptance: 02-05-2018 |
Visión Teórica
Humanística Educativa de la Generación Z 3.0 en Tiempos Complejos
Resumen
El propósito de esta investigación es generar desde una visión teórica
humanística estrategias cognitivas para la construcción de conocimiento de la
generación Z 3.0, donde el docente expresa que sus estudiantes son unos verdaderos nativos
digitales y con la teoría de la mente alcanzar resultados
cognoscentes. Desde el punto de vista metodológico, el estudio se ubica dentro
del paradigma cualitativo en el cual se hace uso del método hermenéutico
dialéctico. En relación con los
informantes claves fueron cuatro (4) docentes adscritos al Instituto de
Geografía, en cuanto a
la técnica se empleó la entrevista, y como instrumento se aplicó la entrevista semi
estructurada. Los datos se procesaron por medio de la categorización de la
información, mientras que la fiabilidad de la investigación está dada por la
triangulación de la misma, y con referencia a la técnica de análisis, se hizo
con la revisión del material recopilado y codificación del mismo para su
respectiva interpretación. La investigación se apoya en un constructo teórico
basado en la teoría de sistemas, que intenta develar en la era digital los
procesos tecnológicos y ambientes de aprendizajes flexibles en aulas virtuales,
el autor concluye que los informantes destacan
la necesidad de ser capacitados en su praxis pedagógica para
transformar las competencias curriculares basadas en e-learning y b-learning
que responden a estos desafíos de la globalización.
Palabras clave: conocimiento; humanismo; docente;
aprendizaje.
Fecha de Recepción: 06-02-2018 |
Fecha de Aceptación: 02-05-2018 |
1. Introduction
The globalization in society of information
and communication networks of the education system is part of humanity,
interpersonal relationships move in virtuality directly affecting the family,
community, educational and professional context, humanism become part of the
intellectual heritage, based on functionalism and cultural and existential
instrumentalism, we are in a technological world, this planetary era is complex
and specifically the education that is involved in intelligent social networks
The planetary age represents a whole of
the human condition and derives in parts that must be known and understood from
a complex approach; global humanity is in constant changes and ways of seeing
the world, globalization from a virtual thinking is mediated by the innovation
of the internet, equally the media and the use that constitutes the native
digital generation in the knowledge society.
The evolution of the world affects human
activities, there is much uncertainty about the scientific-technological era, because
it impacts educational processes, human cognitive capacity leads us to be
reflective and communicative people for innovation in social networks that
carry a challenging message, the The technological gap is less and less limited
by the digital connectivity that surrounds both the student and the teacher in
the classroom.
Modernity gives way to postmodernity in
the technological era, where smart devices based on tiny memories of great
capacity used in cell phones, cameras and computers are observed, however,
human beings will not be displaced by this technology, they produce it, the
analogous is just history and starting point for the new digital advances
produced by this generation called Z.
For Iñaki (2017): the term generation Z,
also known as centennials, has emerged from a generation characterized by
relying on technology and living accustomed to interactions in a virtual world,
its dependence on mobile devices, computers, tables digital, electronic
whiteboard, interconnected to social networks and platforms, that is, the slang
that addresses this virtual environment.
The virtual environment of this generation
Z, increases the creative thinking in the student, these digital natives to
communicate use digital environments, they like synergy and collaborative work,
the purpose is to break the paradigm of traditional education 1.0, take the
qualitative leap to constructivist education 2.0 until we reach education 3.0
or connectivist, which is the digital age that allows us to face the challenges
of the modern educational society.
Native digital students in this
technological age act semantically differently from digital and analogous
teachers. It is interesting to mention that generation Z, their brain is
complex and physiologically dissimilar to both digital and analogue immigrants,
as a consequence of having grown up in a virtual and cybernetic world.
This generational socio-cognitive gap
impacts the development of this generation, education is going through an
economic crisis in the world that significantly affects traditional education,
for this argument virtual education is a possible solution in undergraduate and
graduate, teachers of the XXI century must modernize their thinking, update
their skills to avoid instructing students of the nineteenth and twentieth
century who handle technology and therefore are updated in any field.
Praxeology in teaching at university level
has shown that the arrival of ICT in the educational setting is necessary to
improve educational quality, web 2.0 or social networks generate pedagogical
tranquility and can become synergy for the development of educational proposals
virtual, technology also facilitates collaborative learning and construction of
interconnected communities where we are all apprentices.
This fact poses to us as researchers the
challenge of reconsidering the new teacher based on technological principles in
face-to-face and blended learning, so that they can access virtual knowledge
from their own perspective, creative, critical, beneficial, optimizing in this
way their integral training in the face of the vanguardist demands imposed by
the mastery of new information and communication technologies.
For the above, the following question is
asked: How to explain from the theory of the mind the knowledge of the
generation Z, in the humanistic framework of complexity? To answer the previous
question, it is necessary to systematize the research to through expectations,
namely: How does this generation learn? Is it possible that your brain is
programmed to code and decode differently?
2. Theoretical references
2.1.
Research Background
In all scientific
research, the researcher must deepen to know the state of the art of knowledge,
with a compilation and synthesis of those that present points coinciding with
the research, supported by the main ideas to argue the information, whose
primary concepts are considered to be very important. value.
Fernández and
Fernández (2016): conducted a research entitled "The teachers of
Generation Z and their digital skills", noting that the presence of
technological resources in the centers and the high capacities of the students
of the Generation Technology or Generation Z, not they are enough to develop
digital competence in students. The authors affirm that the fundamental key is
determined by the technological and pedagogical competences of the teachers. In
their work, they analyzed the level of ICT competences of Primary and Secondary
teachers, establishing a reference frame of reference adapted to the Spanish
educational environment. The relationship focuses on the relevance of teacher
training, developing in them particular skills and abilities, that allow them
to acquire the essential skills for effective performance, focusing on the
student awakening interest in matters essential for the development of
humanity.
On the other hand,
Jauam (2013): from the Universidad Abierta Interamericana presents a research
entitled "Perception of Generation Z and school in the 21st century"
with the purpose of knowing what this age group feels and thinks, based on
their perceptions and behaviors, their beliefs about the adaptability of the
school with the new technologies and the teaching methods of the educational
system at present, that is, among the main findings, there were substantive
generational discrepancies between teachers and students associated with the
outdatedness of the current educational system , coupled with the weakness in
digital skills present in their teachers. Likewise, the thesis is sustained on
the changing and globalized world in which these subjects called Generation Z
have lived, permeated by technological stimuli of all kinds. These observations
give an account of the gap between the ways of teaching and learning of this
time and the characteristics of today's students, predisposed to digital,
immediacy and online content as a search preference for information.
2.2.
Theoretical Context
It is pertinent to
mention that the researcher can find discrepancies in the visions and positions
between digital immigrants and digital natives that belong to Generation Z.
Therefore, their task is to unify the positions and create an integrated view
of the reality found to deepen, likewise The precepts of the Theory of Mind and
Complex Thought have been selected as theoretical references, in order to try
to design cognitive strategies for the social construction of knowledge,
understanding the mentalistic capacities that these children have developed
through the stimuli of the digital culture and the need, that from the
teaching, it is required to make a reflective and complex exercise to face
these challenges.
3. Methodological framework
3.1.
Materials and methods
The research was carried out in the Institute of Geography, Faculty of
Forestry Sciences of the University of Los Andes (ULA), destined to diagnose
the causes of the professors who work in that institution. Regarding not using
the appropriate technology with native digital students belonging to generation
Z, however, it is assumed as an operational strategy to carry out research, the
qualitative method with a hermeneutical tendency, since the description of
certain behavioral practices of the professors of this institution indicated
above, in a specific institutional space, whose relations are regulated by
norms that establish obligations, rights and customs.
For Martínez (2006a): "... a debate that transcends the method is
generated, here the discussion about the so-called hermeneutic circle and its
methodological discussions is framed". (page 23) It is necessary to
mention the importance of hermeneutics in social research, because it allows
in-depth interpretation, providing meaning to the informants' findings.
In this order of ideas, hermeneutics incorporates into the text the
dialectical method for the subject where the recognition gives the researcher
openness to discern in each paragraph, equally the qualitative approach
integrates the dialectic in the hermeneutics, the human being by nature is
critical, discursive and interpretive in its environment, reasoning and
dialogue gives certainty minimizing errors, it is necessary that the researcher
understand the equanimity of their epistemological currents.
Martínez (2006b): proposes a qualitative design of the investigative
process based on sequential steps that lead the researcher to focus
sequentially from the selection of the method to the theorization.
Figure 1. Qualitative Process.
SEE IN THE ORIGINAL
VERSION
Source: Martínez (2006).
When beginning to execute each step, the process of data collection
begins, the information provided by each key informant is a primary source when
establishing the diagnosis of the context under study. According to Sabino
(2002): "... an instrument of data collection is any resource that the
researcher uses to approach phenomena and extract information from them"
(page 99).
However, the unit of analysis details each key informant in their
direct or indirect link with the Institute of Geography, the categorization
process together with the specific objectives determines the delimitation of
each dimension and found finding, the project continues to be directed to
design the triangulation, which is of vital importance for the development of
the construct based on the theory and circle of Dilthey.
Table 1. Selection of the
Analysis Units (Key informants)
Teachers
of the Institute of Geography ULA |
Quantity |
Bonding |
Direct |
||
Subject
IC1. Teacher Holder |
01 |
X |
Subject
IC2. Associate Professor |
01 |
X |
Subject
IC3. Teacher Added |
01 |
X |
Subject
IC4. Teacher Instructor |
01 |
X |
Source: The Author (2018).
In any case, the criterion of the initial intentional sample is
assumed, in the sense of consulting the opinion of those people who have more
information about the problem under study, framed in the edges of education
3.0, generation Z and disruptive learning. This fusion is taken from the
researches of each key informant, generating the systemic and socialized
integration in the virtual environment of this generation Z. It is probable
that some people indicate a greater impact on their emotional stability due to
this problem in the work environment.
In this case, the data was collected through interview techniques and
the participatory observation method or method, through the application of
tools such as the field diary or guides that allow fulfilling the objective of
obtaining information on the indicators established for the study of education
3.0, generation Z and disruptive learning.
The field research, with the collected data, constitutes the
researcher essential pieces when analyzing the interview guide constituted by
22 open questions to inquire about the virtual competences of the educational
actors (teachers) in their pedagogical and learning actions for the
construction of knowledge , the population consisted of four (04) teachers as
key informants of the aforementioned Institute, the answers provided by the
informants, form the reference and support of each objective, these axioms
serve as a theoretical basis for the proposed study.
3.2. Development, Results and Discussion
The research
process sequentially addressed the information provided by the units of
analysis by each informant through the interview and direct observation, as
well as the process of triangulation based on the integration of categories, as
well as the position of experts to generate a supported theoretical vision in
the complexity of the professor assigned to the Institute, taking into account
to which technological generation each key informant belongs, to correct
attitudes of resistance to change, to improve communication with these digital
natives.
3.3.
Categorization of Experiences
Table
2. Analysis of the Key
Informant in Virtual Teaching.
SUBCATEGORY: Virtual
Teaching |
KEY INFORMANT: Titular Professor as a Teacher of the Institute of
Geography of the ULA (IC1). |
1. Is the university professor willing to renew his
thinking, methods, means, knowledge, and all the complexus necessary for the
development of his digital competences? Interviewee: I commented that my job
is to teach undergraduate, graduate and doctoral classes, I teach classes
face-to-face and I recognize that there are many digital natives who are not
motivated in traditional activities, I am from a behavioral and digital
analogue generation, which I feel a disadvantage with students who love
social networks, I agree to update my skills. |
2. Do you know Generation Z and believe that group work
can be done? Interviewee: I have not heard about this generation, but I
imagine they are students who grew up with technology, I think you can work
in groups, the idea is to break paradigms and make the leap from traditional
to virtual education. |
3. Can you work in Generation Z with linear descending
communication to impart instructions and demand the fulfillment of virtual
tasks? Interviewee: With a gesture of displeasure he comments, in the
Institute there are teachers who present a linear communication,
communication depends on their student situation since they interact with
technology. Do you think that the teaching process in generation Z 3.0 is
granted in current education? Interviewee: I think that we must first train
technologically, since we teach 20th century classes in contact with 21st
century students who are totally digital natives. Each one can contribute in
order to conceive more pleasant social interaction and thus avoid
technological resistance. |
Source:
The Author (2018).
Figure 2. Triangulation of
Experiences.
IC1: Professor as a teacher of the Institute of Geography
of the ULA.
SEE IN THE ORIGINAL VERSION
Source: The Author (2018).
4. Results
In
view of the objectives of the research, it allowed to characterize the human
and technical skills from a humanistic and complex vision to the Teacher of the
Institute; the students feel little motivation because the teachers of this
dependency do not use the technologies, the professors as digital immigrants
must be updated in the virtual education because they use obsolete data books,
one solution is that the teacher works with bibliography of web repositories
updated, this discussion also does not allow socialization in student decision
making regarding virtual content and platform classes.
Consequently, many
of the teachers are affected by not receiving updates in the area of ICT,
with incidents in geographic information systems that require updated
technological knowledge, as we get with digital native students who have made the
technology a way of life.
According to key
informants, technological ignorance manifests itself in the institute in
different ways, namely:
·
Lack
of motivation for not having obsolete fourth- and fifth-generation technology
in their cubicles.
·
There
is no possibility of updating due to the Country situation.
·
Present
problems due to lack of technological learning since teachers do not know how
to use the Moodle ULA platform to implement courses and e-learning classes
which would motivate the digital native student. Martínez (2011): within the
dialectic hermeneutic method, the author considers it pertinent to capture the
findings based on the hermeneutic circle suggested by Dilthey, which contains
the analysis of reality through the model of what is found as a product of
knowledge and interpretation. of the analysis units.
Figure 3. Dilthey's Hermeneutic Circle.
SEE IN THE ORIGINAL VERSION
Source: The Author (2018).
5.
Proposal
Dilthey's circle, based on the qualitative approach, generates a
theoretical construct based on the competences of the Institute's professor
with respect to technological incidence. It is worth noting that a theoretical
construct was generated based on the Z generation and disruptive learning,
which allowed the grouping of theories, findings and philosophical dimensions
to design and identify competences and include them in the curricular unit,
this cognitive information of the key informants interviewed elucidated the
theoretical construct based on systems theory.
Education 3.0, breaks the paradigms of analogous teachers and digital
immigrants under a complex humanistic vision, as stated in this research, is
associated with the Categorization and Triangulation that formed as a result
the hermeneutic circle suggested by Dilthey adapted to the Institute of
Geography of the ULA; systemically, the theoretical construct based on
generation Z and disruptive learning is created, which is represented as:
Figure
4. Structure of Systematic Thought.
SEE
IN THE ORIGINAL VERSION
Source:
The Author (2018).
Entry:
Key informants and
the Institute of Geography of the ULA.
Process:
Generation Z and
disruptive learning, merged into the following edges:
·
Flipped Classroom.
·
Social networks.
·
E-learning
and b-learning.
·
Curricular holistic
transformation.
·
Filtering information
·
Simulation of the
experience.
·
Information
and Communication Technology (ICT).
·
Feedback.
Departure:
Theoretical Construct
Figure
5. Theoretical Construct focused on Systems Theory.
SEE
IN THE ORIGINAL VERSION
Source:
The Author (2018).
5.1. Objectives of the Theoretical
Construct
·
Encourage
the Professor in the use of technologies.
·
Train
the teacher platforms and web simulators.
·
Make
use of the digital board when it is necessary.
· Design
of instructional programs.
· Curricular
update to education 3.0.
·
Encourage
motivation and reinforce the teacher's self-esteem.
6.
Conclusions
In characterizing the brain functions of
generation Z, it must be handled from a holistic perspective, this research
should be framed in the surrounding reality, with emerging factors and
anthologies to seek reflections and social rethinking that suits those complex
thoughts that ask to be addressed from a perspective of the Z generation from
the theory of the mind, in this surrounding social dynamics, that is to say,
that transcends until changing attitudes of life, with a creative,
self-critical and proactive character.
The cognitive strategies from the
humanistic approach for the construction of knowledge of the generation Z 3.0,
generated epistemological, methodological and practical contributions of the
research that are very useful to generate a theoretical interpretive model that
facilitates the understanding of this generation, and open the debate on a
solid academic training for teachers in the development of digital competences
for the construction of teaching-learning knowledge, where the study is
determined by creativity, innovation and technology, helping to generate
theoretical-technological constructs in the field of The education.
By theorizing the explanatory processes of
the generation Z 3.0, because of the epistemological implications it focuses on
a dialectical hermeneutical vision in complex times channeled into virtual
education to activate through cybernetic beliefs the human being reaffirming
values, ethics morality, responsibility, dignity, integrity and excellence to
recover that educational learning that has lost so many values in society,
teachers must be updated and at the same time teach virtually with educational
platforms such as the Moodle that is used in the University of Los Andes and
thus with the application of the theoretical construct virtual classroom and
blended learning will be of great help in the training of the student born in
generation Z.
7. References
Fernández,
F., & Fernández, M. (2016). Los
docentes de la Generación Z y sus competencias digitales. Comunicar, XXIV(46), 97-105. ISSN
digital: 1988-3293, ISSN impreso: 1134-3478. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.3916/C46-2016-10
Jauam,
G. (2013). “Percepciones de la
Generación “Z” y la escuela en el siglo XXI”. Rosario, Argentina:
Universidad Abierta Interamericana. Sede Rosario - Campus Roca. Recuperado de: http://imgbiblio.vaneduc.edu.ar/fulltext/files/TC113932.pdf
Martínez, M. (2006a,b). Ciencia y arte en la metodología cualitativa. México: Editorial
Trillas,
págs. 20-32.
Martínez, M. (2011). Epistemología y metodología cualitativa en las ciencias sociales.
México: Editorial Trillas, págs. 30-55.
Sabino, C. (2002). El proceso de investigación. Venezuela: Editorial Panapo, págs.
92-99.
Iñaki, O. (2017). El Dilema de la Generación Z. Madrid, España: Deusto Business
School. Este artículo se publicó originalmente en el diario ABC el día 16 de
abril de 2017. Recuperado de: http://www.inakiortega.com/2017/04/el-dilema-de-la-generacion-z.html
Carlos Liborio
Camacho Quintero
e-mail: ccamacho@ula.ve; clcamachoq71@gmail.com
Born in Venezuela Doctor in Advanced Management, Postdoctor
in Management for Human Development (ULA), Magister Scientiarum in Business
Management, Systems Engineer, Bachelor of Business Administration, Senior
University Technician in Computer Science, Senior University Technician in
Marketing. Administrator in TICs Institute of Geography, Faculty of Forestry
Sciences (ULA). Teaching Component (ULA), Professor at Universidad Fermín Toro,
Professor at UPEL, Diploma in Teaching Component in Distance Education,
International Diploma in ICT, Researcher PEII ONCTI, PEII ULA, courses,
workshops, congresses, papers, scientific articles, tutor, jury in thesis
defense (ULA, UNEFA, UPEL and UFT).
The content of this manuscript is
disseminated under a Creative Commons License
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
- Original Version in Spanish -
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2018.3.9.1.20-38