Reviewer Guidelines

Some general criteria suggested when reviewing a paper for the journal are:

1. What the article pursues in terms of:

a. Presentation and analysis of ideas

b. Presentation and analysis of arguments

2. What are its strengths and weaknesses?

a. Is the article still interesting or becomes obsolete?

b. What is the contribution of this paper to the study area?

c. What is the validity of the ideas / arguments?

d. Are the ideas / arguments original?

e. Does the author explain the article ideas / arguments clearly?

f. Are article’s ideas / arguments supported with clear examples, case studies, or data? How valid is this support?, Is it limited or representative? Is it current or obsolete?

g. Would these ideas / arguments help in the cultural context? (Country, city, institution)

h. Does the article present other points of view on the subject? Could it be of interest to an international reader?

i. What is the target audience, general or specific audience? (Professors, students or researchers).

j. What references or contributions may you recommend to the author to solve or better address the weaknes.