Post-pandemic effect on the generational digital gap between teachers and students of the FCA
Efecto postpandemia en la brecha digital generacional entre maestros y alumnos de la FCA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2024.9.32.8.169-188Keywords:
electronic learning, skills development, teaching skills, digital gap, generation gapAbstract
The technological gap linked to the innate digital level of each cohort detracted from the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in educational management. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect that the COVID-19 pandemic had among teachers and undergraduate students of the School of Accounting and Administration (FCA) at the Autonomous University of Chihuahua (UACH), regarding the generational digital divide. The nature of this research was quantitative, applied type, the scope was descriptive, the mode was field with bibliographic support, and the design was non-experimental-longitudinal. A questionnaire was applied in 2020 and 2023 to a stratified sample of teachers and students. The results showed that the personal use of ICT increased by 30% in teachers and 9% in students after the pandemic. Regarding the use of digital tools for training, there was a 10% increase in teachers but a 4% decrease in students. It is concluded that the pandemic boosted the use of ICT mostly in teachers, reducing the digital divide. It would be interesting to study whether the soft skills of new generations did not favor the increase in digital competencies during the contingency.
Downloads
References
Díaz, C., López, M., & Roncallo, L. (2017). Entendiendo las generaciones una revisión del concepto, clasificación y características distintivas de los Baby Boomers, X Y Millennials. Clío América, 11(22), 188-204, e-ISSN: 2389-7848. Colombia: Universidad del Magdalena.
Espiritusanto, O. (2016). Generación Z: Móviles, redes y contenido generado por el usuario. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, 8(114), 111-126, e-ISSN: 0211-4364. España: Injuve (Instituto de la Juventud).
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The History of America´s Future, 1584-2069. New York, United States: William Morrow and Company.
Jardines, F. (2009). Desarrollo histórico de la educación a distancia. InnOvaciOnes de NegOciOs 6(2): 225-236, e-ISSN: 2007-1191. Recuperada de: https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn6.12-5
López, A. (2017). Proyecto de la Nación 2018-2024. México: Auditorio Nacional.
ONU (2023). Se acaba la emergencia por la pandemia, pero el COVID continua. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Naciones Unidas.
UNESCO (2022). El derecho a la educación. París, Francia: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura.
Pérez, J., & Gardey, A. (2017). Aprovechamiento. España: Definicion.de.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Inmmigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. United Kingdom: MCB University Press.
Rozo-García, F. (2020). Revisión de las tecnologías presentes en la industria 4.0. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 19(2), 117-192, e-ISSN: 2145 - 8456. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v19n2-2020019
Crovi, D. (2010a,b). Jóvenes, migraciones digitales y brecha tecnológica. Revista mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales, 52(209), 119-133, e-ISSN: 0185-1918. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
DOF (2020). Acuerdo número 14/07/20. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 INDTEC, C.A.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The content of the journals of this site, are under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.