Organizational Psychology as a Determinant Component of Interdisciplinary Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2019.4.14.5.101-119Keywords:
psychology, organization, behaviour, human beingAbstract
Human beings, as a social element, are responsible for organizations of any kind throughout history, they are the protagonists of their own evolution caused by their interests as survival needs. Therefore, the leading role of Organizational Psychology is essential, being the one in charge of studying both the individual and group behavior of the BE. In that sense, it is presented as a general purpose to analyze Organizational Psychology as a determining component of the interdisciplinary management of the 21st century in order to approach the understanding of the leading role of man in his respective job and his relationship with his coworkers. In this sense, the study from the design of documentary research with a qualitative approach is considered, approaching the approach of the compression of the main author of the film of the evolution of the holistic, complex and globalized world. Therefore, the main research reflection highlights the importance of not continuing to observe the worker as a machine, on the contrary, it is a being of emotions: sadness, joy, which significantly affect the productivity and competitiveness of organizations. Organizational Psychology is responsible for achieving the planned organizational goals.
Downloads
References
Aamodt, M. (2010). Psicología Industrial/Organizacional: Un Enfoque Aplicado. 6ta. Edición, ISBN 10: 607-481-346-9; ISBN 13: 978-607-481-346-3. México, D.F.: Cengage Learning Editores, S.A. de C.V. Recuperado de: https://cucjonline.com/
Chiavenato, I. (2002a,b,c,d). Administración en los nuevos tiempos. ISBN 10: 9584103016; ISBN 13: 9789584103017. Bogotá, Colombia: McGraw-Hill.
Danvila, I., & Sastre, M. (2010). Inteligencia Emocional: Una revisión del concepto y líneas de investigación. Cuadernos de estudios empresariales, (20), 107-126, e-ISSN: 1131-6985. Recuperado de: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3934705
Furnham, A. (2001). Psicología Organizacional. El comportamiento del individuo en las organizaciones. México: Editorial Oxford.
Ivancevich, J., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M. (2012a,b,c). Comportamiento Organizacional. México: McGraw-Hill.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (2008). Psicología social de las organizaciones. México, D.F.: Editorial Trillas.
Martínez, M. (2006). Ciencia y arte en la metodología cualitativa. México: Editorial Trillas.
Morin, E. (1998). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. México, D.F.: Multiversidad Mundo Real Edgar Morin. Recuperado de: http://cursoenlineasincostoedgarmorin.org/
Muñoz, J., & Mesa, I. (2017). Diagnóstico de clima organizacional en una planta de derivados cárnicos. Trabajo de grado. Medellín, Colombia: Universidad de Antioquia. Recuperado de: http://200.24.17.74:8080/jspui/handle/fcsh/840
Rodríguez, J. (2016). Las Organizaciones Complejas. Ingeniería e Investigación, (50), 90-103, e-ISSN: 2248-8723; ISSN: 0120-5609 Recuperado de: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/21428
Rodríguez, M. (2015). La gerencia interdisciplinaria. Lo natural y lo humano. 1ra. Edición, ISBN: 978-980-7453-15-8. Valencia, Venezuela: Instituto de Previsión Social del Personal Docente y de Investigación - IPAPEDI.
Rucci, A. (2008). I-O psychology’s “core purpose”: Where science and practice meet. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 46(1), 17-34.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 INDTEC, C.A.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The content of the journals of this site, are under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.