University students' perceptions of co-evaluation using the Moodle Workshop resource: exploring significant relationships
Percepciones de estudiantes universitarios sobre coevaluación mediante el recurso Taller de Moodle: explorando relaciones significativas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2023.8.30.4.82-102Keywords:
co-evaluation, resources, workshop, moodleAbstract
This study assessed university students' perceptions of peer assessment using the Moodle Workshop tool in the context of the Basic Education program. Surveys were conducted with 150 fifth-cycle students, revealing predominantly positive perceptions regarding utility, fairness, and teamwork facilitation. Non-parametric chi-square analysis was employed to examine hypotheses regarding the relationship between variables such as study hours, prior experience, and technology access. Significant relationships were found, indicating the influence of these factors on the perceived utility of the tool. Complementary interviews supported these findings. In conclusion, Moodle-based peer assessment is well-received and positively impacts students' understanding and collaboration.
Downloads
References
Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Cormier, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Proposal for a Conceptual Framework for Educators to Describe and Design MOOCs. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(1), 6-23, e-ISSN: 0948-6968. Graz, Austria: Graz University of Technology.
Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Second Edition, ISBN: 978-1-897425-08-4. United States: Athabasca University Press.
Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P. (2003). Moodle: Using Learning Communities to Create an Open Source Course Management System. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2003-World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. (pp. 171-178). United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Makhambetova, A., Zhiyenbayeva, N., & Ergesheva, E. (2021). Personalized Learning Strategy as a Tool to Improve Academic Performance and Motivation of Students. IJWLTT: International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 16(6), 1-17, e-ISSN: 1548-1107. Recovered from: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.286743
Panadero, E. (2017a,b). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(422), 1-28, e-ISSN: 1664-1078. Recovered from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Ruíz, E., Martínez, N., & Galindo, R. (2015). El aprendizaje colaborativo en ambientes virtuales. Primera Edición, ISBN: 978-607-8435-10-4. México: Editorial Centro de estudios e investigaciones para el desarrollo docente. Cenid, A.C.
Sharpe, R., & Benfield, G. (2005). The Student Experience of E-learning in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 1-9, e-ISSN: 1744-7747. United Kingdom: Oxford Brookes University.
Silveira, A., Hoff, É., Becker, F., & Bierhalz, G. (2014). Use of Moodle as a Tool for Collaborative Learning: A Study Focused on Wiki. IEEE-Rita: Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 9(1), 17-21, e-ISSN: 1932-8540. España: Capítulo Español de la Sociedad de Educación del IEEE.
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning Analytics: Ethical Issues and Dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510-1529, e-ISSN: 1552-3381. United States: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276, e-ISSN: 1935-1046. Washington, D.C., United States: American Educational Research Association.
Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Design Principles and Outcomes of Peer Assessment in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 341-356, e-ISSN: 0307-5079. Recovered from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680836
Vasalou, A., Joinson, A., Bänziger, T., Goldie, P., & Pitt, J. (2008). Avatars in social media: Balancing accuracy, playfulness and embodied messages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(11), 801-811, e-ISSN: 1071-5819. Recovered from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 INDTEC, C.A.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The content of the journals of this site, are under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.