Formative Vision of the Quantitative Methodology in Education

Authors

  • Neolany María Prieto Rivero Universidad Fermín Toro, UFT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29394/scientific.issn.2542-2987.2017.2.6.19.352-365

Keywords:

vision, methodology, education

Abstract

The intentionality of this essay is to specify epistemic implications concerning a formative vision of quantitative methodology in the context of the educational sciences. It provides an analysis that considers the elements that integrate its characterization, such as nature, type and design of research, hypotheses, variable system, techniques and instruments of data collection, validity and reliability of a study oriented in this approach. For this, it was made a bibliographical review to base its development and to explain in a figurative way each of the aspects mentioned above. This approach, applied to scientific research, refers to the procedures to be followed in order to respond to a problem through the stated objectives, in line with the ontological, epistemological and praxeological conception of current social-discursive practices. All of this allowed to conclude that it is so important to incorporate all the elements required by the methodological framework of all research, as well as the pertinence of the choice of each and every one of them, taking into account the coherence required in the assumed paradigm. Consequently, one must be careful not to enter into contradictions or arbitrariness that obstruct the culmination of work, by confusing the terms used in it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Neolany María Prieto Rivero, Universidad Fermín Toro, UFT

Neolany María Prieto Rivero: Born in Barquisimeto, Lara State, Venezuela. Bachelor of Administration (Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado, UCLA), mention Magna Cum Laude. Professor in Commercial Education (Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador, Pedagogical Institute of Barquisimeto). Master of Accounting (UCLA), Master's Degree in Behavior Guidance (Center for Psychological, Psychiatric and Sexological Research of Venezuela). PhD student in Educational Sciences (Fermín Toro University). Expert in Virtual Education at the Foundation for the technological update of Latin America (FATLA). Instructor Professor at the Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador (UPEL-IPB). Inscribed in the research lines: Strategies, Resources and Innovations of Technical Education and Information and Communication Technologies, Teaching and Innovation.

References

Hernández, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, L. (2010a,b,c). Metodología de la Investigación. México. McGraw-Hill.

Hurtado, I. y Toro, J. (2006). Paradigmas y Métodos de Investigación en Tiempos de Cambio. 5ta Edición. Valencia. Episteme Consultores Asociados C.A.

Kuhn, T. (1981). La Estructura de las Revoluciones Científicas. FCE. México.

Kuhn, T. (1971). Las Estructuras de las Revoluciones Científicas. (Agustín Contin, trad.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica (obra original publicada en 1962). Recuperada de: https://materiainvestigacion.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/kuhn1971.pdf

Moreno, A. (2008). El Aro y la Trama: Episteme, Modernidad y Pueblo. Caracas. Editorial Convivium Press, ISBN: 9781934996003.

Ollarves, V. (2015a,b,c,d). Triada Metodológica de la Investigación desde la Perspectiva Positivista. III Encuentro Nacional para la Socialización del Conocimiento desde el Ser: Un Escenario Académico para la Dialogicidad. Ponencia llevada a cabo en el Programa Postdoctoral en Estudios Libres. UFT, Cabudare, estado Lara, Venezuela.

Ritchey, F.J. (2001). Estadística para las Ciencias Sociales. México, Ediciones: McGraw-Hill.

Rivero, A. (2008). Investigación, creatividad y aprendizaje. Un desafío para el docente en el contexto de la educación venezolana. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad Fermín toro.

UPEL (2008a,b). Reglamento de Estudios de Postgrado. Resolución nro. 2008.316.2018, Extraordinaria nro. 3-2008. Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador. Paraguaná.

Published

2017-11-06

How to Cite

Prieto Rivero, N. M. (2017). Formative Vision of the Quantitative Methodology in Education. Revista Scientific, 2(6), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.29394/scientific.issn.2542-2987.2017.2.6.19.352-365

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.