Factors that produce significant differences in the learning of students who graduate from sixth grade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2019.4.12.1.28-46Keywords:
psychological effects, teaching, learning, language, mathematicsAbstract
The objective of this study was to determine the factors that produce significant differences in the students who graduate from the sixth grade of the Miranda state of Mérida. The problem arises that at present there are still Bolivarian schools with a five-hour day where there are deficiencies in the areas of mathematics and language. The theoretical framework was oriented according to the Venezuelan education system, Bolivarian school, theories of learning. Methodologically, within the positivist paradigm, with a level of descriptive research applying quantitative methods. In the data collection, the following was used as a technique: survey and as an instrument the questionnaire applied to a sample of 72 students during the 2016-2017 school year. The t-student test was carried out using the SPSS program in its copy 15.0 and as a result it was evident: 1). students with an eight-hour day in the language area passed with 40% while five-hour students passed 64.3%; two). it was evidenced in the area of mathematics that the students with eight-hour day have a learning with 3.3% and five hours with 26.2%; 3). The most influential factors on learning were: motivation and family reality; 4). To conclude, a series of methodological guidelines is proposed to overcome factors found.
Downloads
References
Ausubel, N. (1983a,b). Psicología Educativa: Un punto de vista cognoscitivo. 2° edición. México: Ed. Trillas.
Cool, C. (2009a,b). Enseñar y aprender en el siglo XXI: El sentido de los Aprendizajes Escolares. Calidad y equidad en la reforma de la enseñanza. Madrid, España: Fundación Santillana, págs. 110- 112.
Ferreiro, R. (2010). Estrategias didácticas del aprendizaje cooperativo. Una nueva forma de enseñar y aprender: el constructivismo social. México: Trillas.
UNESCO-OREALC (2016a,b). Reporte Técnico. Tercer Estudio Regional Comparativo y Explicativo, TERCE. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Medición MIDE UC de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. [Documento en línea]. Recuperado de: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002471/247123s.pdf
Hurtado, J. (2010). El proyecto de investigación. Comprensión holística de la metodología y la investigación. 6ª edición. Caracas, Venezuela: Ediciones Quirón.
Ley Orgánica de Educación (2009). Gaceta Oficial Nº 5.929 Extraordinario del 15 de agosto. República Bolivariana de Venezuela: La Asamblea Nacional.
Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deportes (1999a). Escuelas Bolivarianas. Documento producido por la Dirección General Sectorial de Programas Educativos del MECD, bajo la Dirección del Profesor Freddy Domínguez. Caracas, Venezuela: CENAMEC.
Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deportes (1999b). Resolución N° 179. Caracas, Venezuela: CENAMEC.
Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Educación (2007a). Currículo de Educación Primaria Bolivariana. Caracas, Venezuela: CENAMEC.
Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Educación (2007b,c,d,e,f). Diseño Curricular del Sistema Educativo Bolivariano. Caracas, Venezuela: ME.
Ramos, O. (2008). Aprendizajes de los estudiantes en escuelas Bolivarianas. Trujillo, Venezuela: ULA.
Rodrigo, M., & Arnay, J. (2007). La construcción del conocimiento escolar. Barcelona, España: Editorial Paidós.
Vygotsky (1979). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos. Barcelona, España: Editorial Grijalb.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 INDTEC, C.A.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The content of the journals of this site, are under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.